It is possible to replace a group of phrases that do not form a constituent.
I bought the big [book of poems with the blue cover] but not the small [one].
The “intermediate” N’ (en-bar) categories to explain conjoined subsequences of items with the sisters of the same mother.
One-replacement: Replace an N’-node with one.
Caveat:
Do-so-replacement: Replace an V’-node with do so/do so too.
\[\begin{eqnarray*} VP \rightarrow V'\\ V' \rightarrow V'\ (PP)\\ V' \rightarrow V'\ (AdjP)\\ V' \rightarrow V\ (NP)\\ \end{eqnarray*}\]Is/Was-so-replacement: Replace an Adj’-node with is so/was so too.
\[\begin{eqnarray*} AdjP \rightarrow Adj'\\ Adj' \rightarrow (AdvP)\ Adj'\\ Adj' \rightarrow Adj'\ (PP)\\ Adj' \rightarrow Adj\ (NP)\\ \end{eqnarray*}\]All phrases appear to have heads.
The requirement is that phrases are headed are called endocentricity.
Non-heads are always phrases and optional in an X-bar rule.
Types of rules:
Adjunct: sister to a single bar level and daughter of single bar level Complement: sister to a head and daughter of single bar level - ex for NPs this would be intro’d by the “of” preposition
Hence you can only have 1 complement as you can only have one X head in a XP.
Projection: All elements introduced (i.e. on the left side of a rule) within an XP.
Maximal Projection: The topmost projection in a phrase (XP).
Intermediate Projection: Any projection that is neither the head nor the phrase (i.e., all the X’ levels)
If a YP modifies some head X, then YP must be either a sister of